|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
All That Is Sacred: A Primer on Spiritual Assessment |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
---- Hill & Pargament, 2003, p. 65 -------------------- Loue and Sajatovic (2006) analyzed data drawn from 41 Puerto Rican women living with severe mental illness (SMI) in northeastern Ohio and found that "[a] large proportion of the participants reported that their religious or spiritual beliefs were critical to their coping, had influenced them to reduce [HIV] risk, and/or provided them with needed social support" (p. 1168). According to the investigators, these data
Loue and Sajatovic stress that "the spiritual components of an HIV prevention intervention must encompass elements of faith that may be common to a wide range of individuals and be sufficiently broad to suggest and allow diversity of belief, including a conceptualization of spirituality that does not require a belief in a higher power" (p. 1177). Additionally, when working with persons with SMI, "[p]ractitioners must have sufficient familiarity with the relevant religious precepts to allow them to distinguish their patients' religious beliefs and rituals from delusions and compulsions ..." (p. 1177; see sidebar). One way to gather the information needed to discern spiritual content reflective of mental illness is to conduct a spiritual assessment. Are You Spiritual Assessment Savvy? According to Richards and Bergin (2005), "[a] religious-spiritual assessment should be embedded in a multilevel, multisystemic assessment strategy" (p. 234). This recommendation extends to work conducted with persons living with HIV/AIDS, because "[v]irtually every study on religion and spirituality conducted among men and women with HIV attests to the significance of ... [these] construct[s] for these individuals" (Pargament et al., 2004, p. 1202). Moreover, "[a] small but growing body of empirical evidence indicates that religiousness and spirituality play an important role in the health and well-being of people living with HIV" (Pargament et al., 2004, p. 1207). How might one then proceed with such an assessment process? "Given ... the fact that research and clinical experience with religious-spiritual assessment … [are] still in an early state," Richards and Bergin observe that "therapists must rely heavily on clinical wisdom and hunches when deciding what religious and spiritual information to seek about their clients" (p. 224). Fortunately, some clinical guidance has been offered by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). JCAHO, an independent, not-for-profit organization that evaluates and accredits nearly 15,000 health care organizations and programs in the United States, now requires the administration of a spiritual assessment (JCAHO, 2004). Hodge (2004, 2006) has outlined a two-stage spiritual assessment process based on JCAHO requirements that may also be of use in non-JCAHO-accredited settings. Initial or Brief Spiritual Assessment Hodge defines spiritual assessment as "the process of gathering, analyzing, and synthesizing spiritual and religious information into a specific framework that provides the basis for, and gives direction to, subsequent practice decisions. ... " (Hodge, 2006, p. 318). He suggests that clinicians begin with an "initial" or "brief" spiritual assessment. "The purpose of the initial assessment is twofold. One goal is to identify the effect of client's spirituality on service provision and client care. ... [F]or service provision to be as effective as possible, spiritual beliefs and practices often have to be taken into account. ... Another goal is to identify whether an additional, more comprehensive spiritual assessment is required" (Hodge, 2005a, pp. 314-315). "At a minimum, the brief assessment should include an exploration of three areas: (1) denomination or faith tradition, (2) significant spiritual beliefs, and (3) important spiritual practices" (Hodge, 2006, p. 318). Hodge's model conforms to JCAHO's spiritual assessment recommendations and consists of four questions:
Hodge encourages clinicians to phrase their questions in this neutral manner, which validates the experiences of clients who are spiritual, religious, both, or neither. After assessing the client's response to the first question, clinicians may decide to divide the second question
With regard to the question on attendance at a church or other spiritual community, "[i]f the client attends a mosque, for example, then that term would be used in all subsequent conversation" (Hodge, 2006, p. 319). The final question inquires about clients' spiritual needs. "In addition to asking about religious needs in a general, nonspecific sense, it may be helpful to list some common spiritual needs (e.g., 'Are there any spiritual needs I can help you address such as arranging a visit from the chaplain or your pastor?')" (Hodge, 2004, pp. 38-39). Moving to a Comprehensive Spiritual Assessment "At least four somewhat interrelated factors may bear on the decision to move from a brief to a comprehensive assessment. It should be noted at the outset that these four guidelines are often held in tension with, and inform, one another. In brief, these four principles can be summarized as respect for client self-determination, the practitioner's ability to provide culturally competent services, the degree to which the norms of the client's faith tradition relate to service provision, and salience of spirituality in the client's life" (Hodge, 2006, p. 320).
Five Complementary Comprehensive Spiritual Assessment Tools Hodge (2005a) reviews and compares five comprehensive spiritual assessment tools that highlight various facets of a client's spiritual life. One tool – the spiritual history – is the only approach that is conducted in an exclusively verbal manner. The other four tools – the spiritual lifemap, spiritual genogram, spiritual ecomap, and spiritual ecogram – are diagrammatic or pictorial in nature. Given space limitations here, readers are encouraged to consult Hodge's original articles (cited below) for detailed accounts of each assessment approach. The following brief descriptions may, however, assist clinicians in selecting the assessment tool most appropriate to the clinical setting as well as the needs and interests of individual clients. Spiritual histories (Hodge, 2001a) are conducted much like traditional family histories in which clients describe their spiritual journeys. "For verbally oriented people, spiritual histories may provide the best assessment method. ... [T]he relatively unstructured format allows clients to relate their stories in a straightforward manner without having to adapt their narratives to fit a particular diagrammatic format. ... Spiritual histories are also easy to conduct. The assessment model is relatively easy to communicate to clients, and the verbal format is conducive to building a therapeutic alliance with clients" (Hodge, 2005a, p. 316). Of course,
Spiritual lifemaps (Hodge, 2005c) cover the same time span as spiritual histories, but in a pictorial format that may be appealing to clients who are more artistic or less verbally oriented. "Much like road maps, spiritual lifemaps tell us where we have come from, where we are now, and where we are going. ... To fully operationalize the potential of this method, it is important to ask clients to incorporate the various trials they have faced along with the spiritual resources they have used to overcome those trials. ... Delineating successful strategies that clients have used in the past frequently suggests options for overcoming present struggles" (Hodge, 2005a, pp. 316-317). "The pictorial lifemap affords practitioners the opportunity to learn more about the client's worldview, while focusing on building therapeutic rapport by providing an atmosphere that is accepting, nonjudgmental, and supportive during assessment. ... Lifemaps ... may [also] be assigned as 'homework,' saving valuable therapeutic time" (Hodge, 2005a, p. 317). For some clients, however, "it may be important to understand the effects of spirituality in greater breadth (that is, among the wider family system) or in greater depth (that is, across generations). In such settings, spiritual genograms may be used" (Hodge, 2005a, p. 317). Spiritual genograms (Hodge, 2001b) "chart the flow of spirituality over the course of at least three generations and may be particularly appropriate in situations in which the extended family plays a more central role" (Hodge, 2004, p. 39). Genograms serve as "a blueprint of complex intergenerational spiritual interactions ... [and] may appeal to clients who prefer a very structured assessment approach" (Hodge, 2005a, p. 319). At the same time,
Spiritual ecomaps (Hodge, 2000; Hodge & Williams, 2002) "depict the … [clients'] present, existential relationships with key spiritual variables in their environment and, consequently, may be useful for more present-focused clients who are interested in exploring current spiritual strengths rather than historical influences" (Hodge, 2004, p. 39), the latter common to spiritual histories, lifemaps, and genograms.
Spiritual ecograms (Hodge, 2005b) "combine the assessment strengths of spiritual ecomaps and genograms in a single assessment approach ... . Ecograms tap information that exists in present space, much like a traditional spiritual ecomap, and also access information that exists across time, like a traditional spiritual genogram. Ecograms also depict the connections between past and present functioning. Historical influences on current systems can be seen as well as present relationships with historical influences ..." (Hodge, 2005a, p. 321).
With regard to family spiritual assessment, "[a]lthough all the approaches can be used with families, perhaps spiritual genograms, ecomaps, and ecograms are best suited for family therapy" (Hodge, 2004, p. 39). Exercise Caution When Using Quantitative Instrumentation At the present time, there exists "an impressive array of measures of religious and spiritual experience for the numerous domains of the religious and spiritual experience" (Hill, 2005, p. 55). In fact, "Hill and Hood (1999) reviewed 125 measures of religion and spirituality from 17 different categories (e.g., beliefs, attitudes, religious orientation, faith development, fundamentalism, attitudes toward death, congregational involvement, and satisfaction)" (Hill & Pargament, 2003, p. 66). Additional quantitative measures of such constructs as perceived closeness to God, religious orientation and motivation, religious support, and religious and spiritual struggle are outlined by Hill and Pargament (2003). Scales that have demonstrated reasonably strong psychometric properties are also highlighted by Hill (2005). Yet, it must be emphasized that "religious and spiritual measures designed for clinical populations ... are rare" (Hill, 2005, p. 44). "Because most religious and spiritual measures have not been adequately validated in clinical situations," Richards and Bergin (2005) stress that "therapists should use them only after carefully examining them and personally verifying their suitability for their clients. Even then, therapists should interpret these measures tentatively. Normative data are so limited for most of these measures that sharing normative comparisons with clients should be avoided. At most, these measures should be used only to give therapists some tentative insights into their clients and perhaps as a tool to help clients engage in exploration and self-discovery" (p. 241). – Compiled by Abraham Feingold, Psy.D. References Hill, P.C. (2005). Measurement in the psychology of religion and spirituality: Current status and evaluation. In R.F. Paloutzian & C.L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 43-61). New York: Guilford Press. Hill, P.C., & Hood, R.W., Jr. (Eds.). (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press. Hill, P.C., & Pargament, K.I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. American Psychologist, 58(1), 64-74. Hodge, D.R. (2000). Spiritual ecomaps: A new diagrammatic tool for assessing marital and family spirituality. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 26(2), 217-228. Hodge, D.R. (2001a). Spiritual assessment: A review of major qualitative methods and a new framework for assessing spirituality. Social Work, 46(3), 203-214. Hodge, D.R. (2001b). Spiritual genograms: A generational approach to assessing spirituality. Families in Society, 82(1), 35-48. Hodge, D.R. (2004). Spirituality and people with mental illness: Developing spiritual competency in assessment and intervention. Families in Society, 85(1), 36-44. Hodge, D.R. (2005a). Developing a spiritual assessment toolbox: A discussion of the strengths and limitations of five different assessment methods. Health & Social Work, 30(4), 314-323. Hodge, D.R. (2005b). Spiritual ecograms: A new assessment instrument for identifying clients' strengths in space and across time. Families in Society, 86(2), 287-296. Hodge, D.R. (2005c). Spiritual lifemaps: A client-centered pictorial instrument for spiritual assessment, planning, and intervention. Social Work, 50(1), 77-87. Hodge, D.R. (2006). A template for spiritual assessment: A review of the JCAHO requirements and guidelines for implementation. Social Work, 51(4), 317-326. Hodge, D.R., & Williams, T.R. (2002). Assessing African American spirituality with spiritual ecomaps. Families in Society, 83(5-6), 585-595. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (2004, January 1). Does the Joint Commission specify what needs to be included in a spiritual assessment? Retrieved January 7, 2007 from http://www.jointcommission.org. Loue, S., & Sajatovic, M. (2006). Spirituality, coping, and HIV risk and prevention in a sample of severely mentally ill Puerto Rican women. Journal of Urban Health, 83(6), 1168-1182. Pargament, K.I., McCarthy, S., Shah, P., Ano, G., Tarakeshwar, N., Wachholtz, A., Sirrine, N., Vasconcelles, E., Murray-Swank, N., Locher, A., & Duggan, J. (2004). Religion and HIV: A review of the literature and clinical implications. Southern Medical Journal, 97(12), 1201-1209. Richards, P.S., & Bergin, A.E. (2005). Religious and spiritual assessment. In P.S. Richards & A.E. Bergin (Eds.), A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy, 2nd ed. (pp. 219-249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ------------------------------------------------ Discerning Spiritual Content Reflective of Mental Illness As Hodge (2004) observes, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition – text revision (DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric Association, 2000)
Hodge stresses that, "[a]lthough psychosis can be manifested in spiritual content, ... spirituality is positively associated with mental health ... [and] spirituality is often a key component in recovery from mental illness. ... [Clinicians] can facilitate the recovery process by helping clients operationalize their spiritual strengths. Conducting an assessment, particularly a complete spiritual assessment, is likely to uncover strengths and resources that can be tapped to foster recovery" (p. 41). References American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author. Hodge, D.R. (2004). Spirituality and people with mental illness: Developing spiritual competency in assessment and intervention. Families in Society, 85(1), 36-44. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
| |